Your buyers are asking AI.
Is your name in the answer?
We measure how many buying-relevant questions ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google AI name you in — and make that number go up. You see your baseline before you pay a cent.
Perplexity
Google AI Overviews
Gemini
Claude
Copilot
We won't show you
someone else's case study.
Open ChatGPT in a new tab and ask one of these — with your industry and your city. You don't need us for this part.
Ask AI what your buyers ask it.
Not your company name — it might know that. Ask the way someone asks who doesn't know you yet:
Is your name in the answer? Then you probably don't need us. If it isn't — AI is recommending someone else, right now, to someone ready to buy. On every one of those questions. Every day.
No-obligation enquiry →Three names.
Yours isn't one of them.
Buyers who used to Google ten providers and compare them now get handed three names. If you're not one of the three, you never find out you were in the race.
The shortlist forms without you
AI names two to four providers. That's the new shortlist. There is no position five — there's "named" and there's "doesn't exist".
It's invisible in your analytics
Someone who finds you via an AI answer then Googles your name or just calls. It shows up as "Direct". You never see what you're losing.
Good rankings don't protect you
Ranking #1 on Google and still not being named in the AI answer is the norm, not the exception. They're two different systems.
The lead is hardening
AI systems cite whoever is already established as the authority. Whoever gets into the answers now will be considerably harder to displace in two years.
We're not promising
you traffic.
That isn't modesty. It's the most honest sentence on this page — and the reason you'll still be with us in month 12.
"AI traffic converts 23× better!"
The number is often even true. What's never included is the denominator. Run it for a site with 10,000 visits a month:
× 0.2 % AI referral = 20 visits
× 1.66 % conversion ("23× better")
= 0.33 leads / month
One lead every three months. And in month 6 the client opens Analytics, sees 40 visits from ChatGPT, and cancels. Rightly — they were sold a channel and handed a rounding error.
Share of Answer
AI search barely sends clicks — it answers the question instead of forwarding it. The influence happens inside the answer. The click doesn't. So we measure the influence, not the click:
Month 3: named in 12 of 30 questions
Main competitor: 8 → 5
Reproducible, in front of you.
The metric we promise is the metric you'll judge us on. So we promise one we can prove — and one that shows what actually happened.
How you get
into the answer.
AI systems don't invent their recommendations. They pull them from sources they consider trustworthy. Our job is to get you into exactly those sources — and make you findable and unambiguous once you're there.
Prompt set & baseline
We define 20–30 questions your buyers actually ask — not keywords, sentences. That becomes the yardstick for everything after.
Citation gap analysis
Which sources do AI systems actually cite in your category? Where does your competitor appear and you don't? We work from measurement, not assumption.
Entity & schema work
So AI recognises you as a distinct company and doesn't confuse you with a similar-sounding one: consistent data, structured markup, a clean company profile.
Content that can be quoted
Fact-dense, clearly structured, directly answering. Not more blog posts — content a model can cleanly lift a sentence from and attribute to you.
Citation building
Presence on exactly the sources demonstrably cited in your category — trade directories, comparison sites, forums, review platforms, industry press.
Share-of-Answer report
One page a month: where you were, where you are, what moved for your competitors. With the original answers attached as evidence. No 40-page deck.
What we don't do —
and why.
GEO is a young market with a lot of promises and very little evidence. Almost every competitor of ours sells these three things. We don't.
Set up & "maintain" llms.txt
Sold across the industry as a deliverable, sometimes even as a recurring monthly line item. Google's John Mueller on it: "no AI system currently uses llms.txt" — you can see in your server logs that they don't even check for it. He compares it to the keywords meta tag.
If that changes, we'll set it up in twenty minutes. As long as it does nothing, we won't bill for it.
Wikipedia & Wikidata entries
A popular sales promise. Wikipedia requires paid editors to disclose their client, notability cannot be purchased, and Wikidata explicitly prohibits commercial providers from creating items about clients for marketing purposes.
That's not a deliverable, it's a reputational risk in your name.
Traffic and revenue forecasts
AI visibility can't be attributed click by click — there's no query data, no click data, and the models don't answer deterministically. Anyone who builds you a revenue forecast from it made it up.
We measure what's measurable: whether you get named. We don't assert the rest.
Sources for this page
- John Mueller (Google) on llms.txt: "FWIW no AI system currently uses llms.txt" — Search Engine Roundtable
- Wikipedia policy on conflict of interest and paid editing — Wikipedia:Conflict of interest
- Cloudflare on AI providers' crawl-to-referral ratios — Cloudflare Radar
- Industry criticism of GEO as a distinct discipline — Digiday, March 2026
From measurement
to mention.
Baseline & audit
Define the prompt set, measure across every AI system, Share of Answer against three competitors, citation gap, technical check. You get the report plus a one-hour call — and know exactly where you stand. Even if you don't continue.
Foundation
Entity and schema work, content restructured for quotability, first citations on the sources that actually count in your category. This is the work that compounds later.
Measure, push, repeat
Monthly measurement of the same prompt set. What works, we double down on. What doesn't, we drop. Every month you get one page with the original answers as evidence.
Most providers in this market hide their pricing behind a phone call. Here's ours.
- ✓ 20–30 buying-relevant prompts
- ✓ Baseline across every AI system
- ✓ Share of Answer vs. 3 competitors
- ✓ Citation gap analysis
- ✓ Technical check (schema, entities)
- ✓ 90-day action plan
- ✓ 1h call — the report is yours
- ✓ Everything in the audit
- ✓ Monthly measurement of the prompt set
- ✓ 2–3 quotable assets per month
- ✓ Entity, schema & knowledge graph work
- ✓ Citation building on proven sources
- ✓ Share-of-Answer report + strategy call
- ✓ Direct with the founder, no juniors
- ✓ Everything in Share of Answer
- ✓ Digital PR & active placements
- ✓ Multiple markets / languages
- ✓ Extended prompt set (60+)
- ✓ Deep competitor monitoring
- ✓ 4–6 assets per month
- ✓ Two strategy calls a month
All prices excl. VAT · The audit (€990) is credited in full against your first month if you continue with a retainer · Cancel monthly, no minimum term, no setup fee · Swiss clients are billed in CHF
Share of Answer moves in
90 days — or we keep working.
Free of charge until the number moves.
In week 1 we measure your baseline — in writing, with the exact prompt set. If your Share of Answer hasn't risen after 90 days, we keep working at no cost until it does. We can offer that because the number is measurable, not interpretable: either AI names you or it doesn't. There's nothing to spin.
The most honest section
on this page.
We won't show you case studies we can't prove.
Before building this page we read through ten German-speaking GEO agencies. Not one shows a verifiable client result. They all cite the same borrowed studies. One puts "74% Share of Answer" prominently on the page — with "illustrative representation" in small print underneath.
We could put three invented quotes from "Sandra M., consulting, Graz" right here. Half the industry does. We don't — because if we're explaining on the same page that we skip llms.txt since it demonstrably does nothing, we can hardly invent clients underneath it.
What we offer instead: your own measurement. Your questions, your competitors, your numbers — before you book a retainer. It's verifiable, it's reproducible, and you can check it yourself in the moment you're reading this sentence. No testimonial on earth is worth as much as a screenshot of your own baseline.
No account manager.
Christoph Sacher
I've been doing organic growth since "GEO" and "AEO" weren't acronyms yet. In that time the rules have shifted from links to topics to AI citations — and with them, the amount of nonsense you can sell on the back of it. At ResultStars we don't sell that.
Answers to common questions.
Not worth it: when your average job is €200 and customers decide on price and proximity. For a typical trades business, Google Business, reviews and local ads will do more per euro. We'll tell you that in the first call, before you pay anything.
The shortlist is forming
without you.
AI Visibility Audit for €990 — credited against your first month. You get your baseline across 30 buying-relevant questions, a comparison against three competitors, and an action plan. The report is yours, whether you continue or not.
No-obligation enquiry →